• Home
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact


Indiana Doesn’t Need “Right to Work”
Jan 12, 2012
by lunchpail
1 Comment

Brian Bosma calls this legislation about “worker freedom,” but the facts are stacked against him.

  • Federal law has banned forced unionism since 1963 (National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors, 1963)
  • Federal law prevents non-members from paying union dues, requiring them only to pay the cost of administering their contract (Communication Workers of America v. Beck et al, 1988)

The only difference between current law and what the Republican leadership is proposing is that they want non-members to pay nothing. That is not about benefiting workers, but about taking revenue away from the unions.

This is our state’s number one priority? With all the problems in our state, our leadership has lost their way, focusing on breaking unions.

A lot of Republicans love their unions, too, and the leaders have gone too far. Luckily, the rest of our party is starting to speak up to legislators, and the “right to work” freight train that Bosma and Long bought tickets for is stuck in the station.

As more traditionally-rooted Republican legislators realize in the days to come that their leadership has been lying to them about what “right to work” really is, all momentum that once existed behind this bill will be lost.

Even Mitch Daniels agreed in 2004 that Indiana did not need “right to work.” You can read the letter he wrote right here. Note that this broken promise was written on campaign letterhead.

To Republicans who vote for this bill- you have not seen the last of us. If you believe in this bill, you have lost your Republican principles, and it is time for someone to take your place.

Social Share
One Comment
  1. Darryl Vargo January 16, 2012 at 8:18 AM Log in to Reply
    Having had the opportunity to canvas several neighborhoods in the 15th district Saturday morning and afternoon(Jan. 14th) . I found every resident, in three different subdivisions ,were happy to sign cards informing representative Lehe , that they in fact do not support a " right to work " bill ! Representative Lehe , should listen to the registered voters in his district and not support a measure, that Mitch Daniels didn't and wouldn't support ,when it was put before him and he risked a possible reelection bid.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

rss
twitter

HEADLINES

© Copyright 2012 Lunch Pail Republicans™. All rights reserved.
Paid for by Lunch Pail Republicans™ Independent Expenditure Only Committee and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.